Old Drugs Made New and Expensive
|A drug that’s been used for 3000 years to treat gout saw its price increase 50-fold; an old drug that helps prevent premature births suddenly costs $400 per injection; cough and cold medicines are pulled off of the shelves. What is going on?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2b1f/a2b1f2e1ccf8cc2baf0c9a4e900c25c5f09c6a5a" alt=""
It’s called the DESI project. DESI stands for the Drug Efficacy Study Implementation. It was implemented as part of the rushed and poorly worded Kefauver Harris Amendment to the 1962 Federal, Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. That amendment required (in part) that every new drug for which someone received a patent between 1938 and 1962 needed to be re-tested to be sure that it was not only safe but effective. Effective, in this case, means only that the benefits outweigh the risks of taking the drug no matter how slightly. But not all drugs got a patent between 1938 and 1962. The gout medicine, for example, has been used for much of human history. And without a patent at that. It, and about 2% of all prescriptions in America, were grandfathered in and were now illegal.
The FDA did not want to create a shortage of these old drugs because of a poorly worded law. So it said that until a manufacturer submitted a patent application which the FDA reviewed and approved, we could continue to buy these old drugs at their familiar, low prices. But the minute a patent application is approved, all other versions of the drug have to be removed because this old medicine is now “new” and its “sponsor” (who did not invent a thing) gets to enjoy five to 20 years of monopoly. In other words, the drug company that has the lawyers at the ready to submit the right paperwork on a drug that’s been around for decades or even thousands of years can make a lot of money.
The FDA started implementing this ill-thought through amendment in 2006. Well-paid lawyers now keep track of the next old/new drugs whose prices are about to go through the roof. You might be interested to know (for example) that estrogen (the Pill) is on the list. If you are a woman of child-bearing age, you may have to pay through the nose not to have kids. Because of DESI.
We can do something about this. These drugs are so old and have been in use for so long that FDA could monitor real world evidence of their effectiveness and approve their sale as generics on that basis. But only if Congress passes a law letting them do so.
Congress seems to be interested in bringing down drug prices. Why not begin by altering the Kefauver Harris Amendment of 1962? According to Peter Hutt, the DESI project will hike the prices on 12,000 to 16,000 drugs. And what are these drugs?
Peter Hutt relays part of an FDA testimony from 1960: “The drugs cleared through the new drug procedures since 1938 constitute the most important medical advances in history. Among these drugs are all of the sulfa drugs except sulfanilamide which was exempted by the grandfather clause of the 1938 Act, many of the antibiotic drugs, the steroids, including sex hormones and anti-inflammatory agents, corticotropin, all of the antihistamines, tranquilizers, antimotion sickness pills, diuretics, hypotensive agents, anticoagulants, antidiabetic drugs and many” others.
All of these are about to get very, very expensive unless Congress acts.
Problem is due to a totally corrupt political system. One that favors wealth (personal or corporate) over the people it “supposedly” representatives. And both of our major political parties today effectively have been “paid off” to serve their economic masters.
I think the main problem is that we have stopped paying attention. When de Tocqueville toured America, he was impressed by how involved and how knowledgeable Americans were about their government. That’s why we were able to reverse course when stuff wasn’t working. And look this problem was born out of fear. In 1962, the UK introduced Thalidomide to help expectant mothers with morning sickness. It was not a safe drug and thousands of babies were born with terrible birth defects. The FDA kept Thalidomide from our shores. Frances Oldham Kelsey, the FDA reviewer who said no, should have a something named after her IMO. But Americans freaked and passed the Kefauver Harris Amendment in months. There was no real time to think about all the different things it would do (some were good and are now being copied by the EU for example) some like DESI were idiotic. The FDA gave Congress loads of time to change its mind. It didn’t start implementing this part of the 1962 Act till 2006. Congress didn’t. But now that we are dealing with real consequences of the DESI project, we should call our representatives and tell them that this would be a good time to let FDA use real world evidence to test the effectiveness and safety of these really, really old drugs. If a company put a patent in (called an NDA) fine. But it can’t be renewed and the period of exclusivity is shorter. We don’t want to break the pharma industry (which is curing cancer) but we also don’t want to pay for lawyer time and nothing else.